Without
being subjective in my view of the quality and appealing nature of the film I would
say that this was a successful film. You can’t define success because it is
subjective but I tried to look at the core of the movie and look at the
numbers. The movie made over 100 million dollars internationally which is a lot
more than tons of movies. Just looking at that it obviously appealed to a wide
audience of both children and older people. You might say that the trailer might
have intrigued people and it wasn't a good movie but a disappointing one that
was anticipated. In actuality the movie only made around a third of that money
from the starting weekend, so it had to have people talking right? According to
Rotten Tomatoes its dark tone and slenderness was a heartfelt adaptation of the
classic children’s book. The movie also received a 74 which topped Fast and Furious, Riddick, and Despicable Me
2. These were tough competitors to beat, especially Despicable Me 2 which has the same fan base and is a sequel to a
highly successful first film.
Other
than numbers the critics seemed to for the most part enjoy the film adaptation
which was hard to bring to life. I think the major adversity to the film and
its production was the gaps left by Sendak because his book wasn't meant for a
film. Spike’s plot line had to make sure not to compromise the integrity of the
film while chewing up time. I think that Spike’s ideas were great and served
that purpose well. This was another success to me and was probably the main
goal the team was trying to achieve. The CGI was amazing for a children’s film
in which I thought was going to be a joke. I could barely tell that the film
used CGI for the wild things. This was great considering the importance of the
wild things and their effect on Max. Not to mention the landscape and
backgrounds seemed to be so real. One thing however I did not like was the
acting job done for Max. The actor seemed to be so fake and a came off to be
whiny who actually never learned anything. This kind of dropped the ball but
luckily it got saved by the performance of the wild things. The voice actors
were what I was expecting when I read the book and I did enjoy them. So overall
I felt that the acting was par because Max was such a major character.
Last
but not least the soundtrack of the film I felt was correct and corresponded
for the most part with the film. The soundtrack in my perspective was original
and worked with the film instead of against which can be the downfall for some
movies. With all these contributions the film was a very successful movie even
if I thought the movie was boring and not in tune with my interest. I think the
lack of action and only one character who is young was a real physical actor
hurt the movie but that was the books fault.
No comments:
Post a Comment